Saturday, May 8, 2010

Owen Takabayashi Interview

April 20, 2010, Ever Gold Gallery

A conversation with artist Owen Takabayashi before his upcoming solo exhibition.

Interviewers: Alex Braubach & Christian Ebert

Christian: [moving camera around the room] The sun is shining, a beautiful, gorgeous day in San Francisco, California. Here is Mr. Owen Michael Takabayashi, straight out of Torrance, Southern California, still straight ballin’ after 31 years. We’ve got a fresh shipment of blood-sausage and other yummies, smuggled into the country by Eva Braun. It’s 4/20. [To Owen] This is the man. [To Alex] This is the master of ceremony for now. And these are the questions.

Alex: What is your current age, location and occupation?

Owen: 31, San Francisco, unemployed.

A: You answered them all right. Describe a day in the life of Owen Takabayashi.

O: Right now I just wake up late, that’s all I do. Coffee, cigarette, shower, eat and avoid the studio.

A: Why, Owen, are you still making art?

O: I have a lot of free time.

C: You told me a few times that you’re sick of it.

O: I am sick. I haven’t been making art really.

C: After everything you’ve been through, why do you still keep making it?

O: I guess because I’m still trying to find out what it is, what art work is. It’s kind of a search. Why do you make art [to Christian]?

C: Because it’s a fun quest to know where I am. It’s like that. It’s the same answer.

O: Kind of like life I guess. It’s an analog, or a metaphor (pause) or a parallel.

O: Why do you make art? [To Alex]

A: You’re not asking me I’m asking you.

C: It’s a conversation buddy.

O: A dialogue.

A: Well then you guys have the conversation. I’ll be the moderator. What’s the main reason you guys make art? Does it have anything to do with your daily occupation whatsoever, or who you are or where you‘re from?

O: I think it goes the other way around. The job that you do part time is right now. Art is kind of like…it’s in everything.

C: Other question, what would you do if you weren’t making art?

O: Maybe farm, I’d like to farm maybe, try it out. I’ve never tried that.

A: Where did you grow up?

O: Torrance, California.

C: What happened when you told your parents you were moving to S.F. to go to art school? Were they really pissed?

O: They were pretty happy…to get me out of the house.

C: They weren’t worried about you going to The Bay and going to some crazy art school? They didn’t think their kid was going to end up in the gutter in the loin, like, where we are right now?

O: Well, we ended up here.

A: What’s wrong with that?

C: No, I’m just wondering.

O: I think they had faith.

C: They didn’t want you to become a doctor or a lawyer?

O: That’s my brothers.

C: So you had the free ride?

O: Yeah, I was in the middle.

A: Why are you going to paint everything in the room one color?

O: Because I thought some of the visual art I’m making right now, it can be inconsequential. I don’t know. Is art of any consequence? I guess it is in some senses. I think I just have to take a more active role in what I’m doing.

A: Explain this inconsequential art to me. I don’t quite get the jist on that.

O: You don’t think art is inconsequential? Like it doesn’t matter?

A: Art that doesn’t matter. You’re saying your art is inconsequential?

O: Not consequences in the sense of good or bad things coming from it, but actually saying something that matters. A symbol. It’s a very hard thing to do. You could say…

C: Try to reveal something?

O: Try to reveal something. You could try to reveal nothing, try to confuse your realization.

C: Or you can fight something with your art too. Whatever that might be.

O: Yeah. I guess I am striving to do that, to communicate something good. Something of consequence.

C: I think there is something that drives all of us, [to Alex] you too, even if you are in denial of it. There is something that drives all of us to keep doing this and we might not be able to articulate it because we haven’t really thought about it or haven’t really put it into words. But for some reason we all, I mean… why are we sitting here doing this? It’s the same question.

O: To be connected with your life. I guess it’s to be of consequence to the world.

C: So maybe there is consequence in whatever you do. There is always consequence. It might have a big impact or a small impact.

O: Or no impact.

C: Just the fact that you are making art instead of being a tennis instructor or something has a consequence, too.

A: The fact that people are looking at your artwork is a consequence.

C: Yeah there’s going to be 300 people looking at your show.

O: I guess it’s trying to also live up to saying something meaningful in a good way.

A: It’s a tough question.

C: It’s a question we can all ask ourselves.

O: I think it’s also aesthetic. I try to be precise.

A: Super precise. No shebang around it. Like the universal balance.

O: It’s weird because there is always going to be that too. Where does that come from? Creating something, so it’s there?

A: Where do you feel that minimal, inconsequential irony comes from?

O: Maybe its personality, I’m quiet by personality.

C: I’ve seen other sides of you buddy.

O: I guess it’s more vague but it’s like, precise at the same time. To be minimal…I guess I’m trying to be efficient.

A: Art is efficiency.

C: What are your interests? What other artists are you looking at?

O: I like everything. Minimalism is definitely one. I don’t look at enough art. My favorite piece recently was by Anish Kapoor. That bell at the MOMA. He had the bell piece in the MOMA. Covered in ultra marine. It was very simple, made out of fiberglass. Some kind of mold of a bell turned on its side and you just looked into it and it was almost like a meditation. I think that’s some of the art that interests me, that brings on a different state of thinking.

A: Looking into the bell. Right. Like it’s a different kind of experience.

O: Like it’s a different state of being almost. Because its one color, its blue.

A: So you’re drawn to it because of the experience, not necessarily the way it looks?

O: But that’s part of it. The way it looks is important. The form and the color of it is going to decide what your experience is. That’s some of the art that I like. Some others are Richard Prince, Ed Ruscha and Nauman Bruce.

C: So what do you think of clowns Owen? Tell me the clown story. Let’s get back to storytelling.

O: Well, I was invited to a birthday party in first grade or younger. My mom brings me, and I show up and there is a clown there and I see the clown and freak out.

C: Was it your friend’s birthday?

O: Just a classmate. But I freak out and I couldn’t go into the party. I had to go home.

C: You didn’t even go to the party at all? What happened to the present you were supposed to bring? Did you keep it for yourself?

O: I don’t know. I never thought about that.

C: What did that clown look like?

O: I don’t remember. A general clown.

A: A general clown?

C: Just a scary old clown?

A: I don’t like clowns.

O: You don’t like clowns?

A: No.

O: I think I’m alright with clowns now. I’ve grown into it, or out of it.

C: When was the last time you saw a clown? I mean, you’re sitting here with two clowns right now.

A: We’re not dressed up dude. I mean, that’s a whole different kind of clown.

O: You’re still clowns though.

A: Would you say you’ve got a difficult relationship with clowns though?

O: Not anymore.

A: You’ve gotten over that?

O: Humans are clowns. Life is funny. Maybe that’s what freaked me out, when I was little. Seeing the Death Mask.

C: Artists are clowns, pretty much.

A: “Death Mask”…

O: Maybe I’m not fully satisfied with my art. Maybe that’s why I’ve been avoiding making the stuff. Just saying that artists are clowns. You know, maybe my jokes aren’t funny enough yet. Or they’re just bad. Bad jokes. That’s the worst.

C: Can art can change the world, Owen?

O: Yes.

A: As long as you got a joke to tell man.

O: That’s an optimistic one.

C: That’s a good answer.

O: As long as we keep laughing I guess.

A: You should be a stand-up comedian.

O: The most depressing stand-up comedian.

Edited by Molly Stewart


Owen's show continues until May, 27 2010.

The Ever Gold is open Wednesday through Saturday, 3-8 pm.
441 O'Farrell St, between Taylor and Jones,
San Francisco, CA 94102.

Friday, April 30, 2010

Windouus





"WINDOUUS"


Opening May 6th 2010 6-9PM
Closing May 27th 2010 6-9PM



Featuring new works by:

Erik Wilson
Chris Ritson
Shalo P.
Shemoel Recalde
Josh Roberts


Shalo P.

Shalo P. is a San Francisco audio/visual artist interested in emotions and ways of describing feelings. His projects, spanning out into various media, including installation, live performance, drawings and video, seek to intermingle explosive form with dazzling light shows charged in the desperate energy of longing, desire and hope. When asked what he does in particular he usually says he's just "surveying the digital apocalypse and embellishing it with rainbows".

With WINDOUUS, Shalo will be unveiling AWESOME STUFF 2 during the third week - a special screening of vibrant eponymous material and performing a special suite of music at the show's closing (along with his musically inclined companions featured in the show) as FRIENDSHIP FRIENDS FOREVER (rainbow band), a musical project that defies simple description.

http://www.thatsforsure.net/shalo.php

http://geojedi.org/

video link:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awnmdTAbRGw


Erik Wilson

Erik Wilson is a Bay Area Artist working in video, animation, and sound. His work explores early motion graphics and the synthetic re-creation of naturally occurring systems. He has recently gone back in time with consumer grade technology in order to create new interfaces for experiencing video environments.


Shemoel Recalde and Joshua Roberts

Shemoel Recalde is a multi-media artist based in San Francisco, specializing in creating live rainbow interactive dream experiences, in sound and video. Joshua Roberts is a San Francisco based artist working in sound composition and sculpture. Through using found pieces of wood and rocks from the earth, Shemoel and Joshua create a harsh, yet delicate relationship between electronics and natural elements through interactive sound and video. The duo also performs together quite often, as the 2-piece electronic band Shimomitsu, which integrates audio and video with physical computing to create live interactive experiences. Their newest piece, Stone in the Sword, will be a gentle, tactile experience in the hands of a highly visceral, psychedelic tsunami.

http://www.shimomitsu.com

http://www.vimeo.com/shemoel

http://www.myspace.com/shimomitsu


Chris Ritson

---Mimesis (a critical/philosophical term pertaining to the ideas of mimicry, representation, copies, the act of expression and the presentation of the self)

Historical usage (traditionally) starts with Plato's distinction of mimesis as a mimicry of nature in the arts (mimicry in the sense of showing, rather than telling (see diegeisis). Conceptions of mimesis run through the cannon of western philosophy and become particularly relevant with the advent of reproducible mediums (from classical painting, print and photo - see Walter Benjamin's The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction)

Mimesis is more relevant than ever when we look at the relationship of art to digital mediums, where the possibility for infinite reproductions (with no loss of quality) is possible for the first time in history. Post-colonial/feminist theorists have claimed the term in relation to "strategic essentialism", which refers to a strategy that nationalities, ethnic groups or minority groups can use to present themselves against oppression.

Most relevant is the relationship of mimesis to our conceptions of the self in terms of "the act of expression and the presentation of the self." In sociological terms, this translates to impression management: the process through which people try to control the impressions other people form of them. It is a goal-directed conscious or unconscious attempt to influence the perceptions of other people about a person, object or event by regulating and controlling information in social interaction. Thus we have the dynamics of social networking sites on the internet, emails and the whole cloud of digital auras we shroud ourselves in everyday.

This is a dynamic that humanity has constructed to reproduce an idea of NATURE in a way that seems more real. One example constantly reused to express mimesis is the architecture of the Parthenon. The columns are not built straight, but instead, built in a way that makes them appear optically straight - a standard perceived as truer than its reality.

http://www.chrisritson.com/


"... Or Oblivion..."

New work by Owen M. Takabayashi

Please join us for the opening of Owen Takabayashi's second solo show “…Or Oblivion…” at the Ever Gold Gallery. This striking series of new work is based on the Major Arcana of the divinatory tarot and will be on display as an all-involving installation in the gallery’s back room.

Takabayashi’s palette is a blend of the economical use of materials characteristic for Minimalism and Arte Povera combined with Dadaist humor and the deceptive qualities of Op-art. On one hand the artist’s work can be viewed as meditative exercises in endurance and efficiency. On the other hand the audience is urged to read the art as critical commentary on current global issues such as the Olympics, ponzi schemes and social inequality.

Takabayshi grew up in the suburbs of Los Angeles. He claims a dubious high-school prank got him grounded for a year, which subsequently sparked a fury of art making. He holds a BFA degree from the San Francisco Art Institute and is currently employed as a freelancer. The exhibition will be on view until May 27th 2010.

Closing Reception April

Closing Reception for

Ryan Coffey and Jason Grabowski

and
Nicole Buffett



Friday, April 23, 2010

closing Reception April

Please join us next Thursday for our monthly closing reception with live music


Thursday at Ever Gold Gallery
music starts around 8

441 O'Farrell between Taylor and Jones